Buddy Thomason
11-29-2009, 06:19 PM
This project required a technique that gets talked about a lot but not used very often. The task was to document a damascus blade, the first in a series.
A flat side view wasn't much of a problem. Click to enlarge, then you may have to click on the image again to make it open fully in your browser window:
#1 http://www.fototime.com/380FF5999711A0B/thumbnail.jpg (http://www.fototime.com/380FF5999711A0B/orig.jpg)
I thought we were done then Josh asked for a shot looking down the blade:
#2
http://www.fototime.com/6E8B643FF2378DE/orig.jpg
This one is a composite of eight separate exposures, each sharply focused on a 1/8th section of the blade, tang to tip. It's tough (impossible) to shoot that close and have depth of field deep enough to get everything in focus with a single exposure. It worked - at least Josh was satisfied.
But it's also kind of disorienting to look at. It's as if the eye/brain is confused by the absence of something it had expected to see: those inevitable areas of variable focus in most photographs that allow the viewer to judge relative distances etc. Weird. :confused:
A flat side view wasn't much of a problem. Click to enlarge, then you may have to click on the image again to make it open fully in your browser window:
#1 http://www.fototime.com/380FF5999711A0B/thumbnail.jpg (http://www.fototime.com/380FF5999711A0B/orig.jpg)
I thought we were done then Josh asked for a shot looking down the blade:
#2
http://www.fototime.com/6E8B643FF2378DE/orig.jpg
This one is a composite of eight separate exposures, each sharply focused on a 1/8th section of the blade, tang to tip. It's tough (impossible) to shoot that close and have depth of field deep enough to get everything in focus with a single exposure. It worked - at least Josh was satisfied.
But it's also kind of disorienting to look at. It's as if the eye/brain is confused by the absence of something it had expected to see: those inevitable areas of variable focus in most photographs that allow the viewer to judge relative distances etc. Weird. :confused: